Skip to Content
Call Today! Fresno: (559) 431-4888 | San Diego: (619) 399-7700
Top
Financial Elder Abuse

My loved one is the victim of financial elder abuse

California Welfare and Institutions Code section 15610.30(a) broadly defines financial abuse, which occurs when a person or entity does any of the following:

  • takes, secretes, appropriates, obtains or retains, any interest in real or personal property, for a wrongful use, or with intent to defraud or both; or
  • assists in doing any of the above described acts; or
  • does any of the above described acts through “undue influence” as defined in Welf. & Inst.C. § 15610.70. [Teselle v. McLoughlin, 173 Cal. App. 4th 156, 174, 92 Cal. Rptr. 3d 696, 712 (3d Dist. 2009)]

Senior citizens are often vulnerable to financial exploitation on varying levels. They can be victimized by strangers, family, fiduciaries, caregivers, friends or neighbors. The California Legislature enacted the Elder Abuse Act “to protect elders by providing enhanced remedies which encourage private, civil enforcement of laws against elder abuse and neglect.”

Unlike in a normal fraud case, the financial elder abuse victim need not show actual or reasonable reliance to his or her detriment. Financial elder abuse is a form of fraud where no actual or reasonable reliance must be shown — and in some instances, no intent to defraud need be shown either.

Additionally, financial abuse provides many remedies including attorneys’ fees and costs, in addition to compensatory damages, pain and suffering, and all remedies provided by law. Welf. & Inst.C. § 15657.5 provides that upon proof by a preponderance of the evidence “that a defendant is liable for financial abuse” under Welf. & Inst.C. § 15610.30, “in addition to (compensatory damages) all other remedies otherwise provided by law,” the court shall award attorney fees and costs, including the cost of the services of a conservator devoted to the litigation of a claim for financial abuse. [Wood v. Jamison, 167 Cal. App. 4th 156, 164-165, 83 Cal. Rptr. 3d 877, 884-885 (2d Dist. 2008)] Attorney fees are unilateral to the plaintiff only. [Bell v. Mason, 194 Cal. App. 4th 1102, 125 Cal. Rptr. 3d 229 (2d Dist. 2011), as modified, (May 5, 20110.]

Because a victim can be awarded attorneys’ fees, this statute provides a powerful tool to protect one’s rights. Moreover, if the conduct proven is with malice, oppression, or fraud, punitive damages can be awarded under Civ.C. §3294(b).

Let’s Discuss Your Case
Ready to take the next step? Contact us today to schedule your consultation and get the answers you need.

Built on Integrity, Driven by Results, Committed to You Our Guiding Principles

  • Innovative Legal Strategies
    Our team combines creative problem-solving with compassionate counsel to guide you through every step of your legal journey.
  • Experience You Can Count On
    With decades of combined legal expertise, we confidently navigate complex cases to protect your rights and achieve favorable outcomes.
  • Personalized Advocacy, Proven Results
    We deliver customized legal solutions backed by a track record of success, ensuring your unique needs are always our top priority.
  • No Win, No Fee – Your Justice Guaranteed
    We believe in your case and stand by you with a contingency fee structure—no legal fees unless we secure a win for you.

Financial Elder Abuse FAQ's

Have questions? We are here to help. Still have questions or can't find the answer you need? Give us a call at 559-431-4888 today!

  • Who can be an abuser?

    An abuser can be:

    • Strangers
    • Friends and/or neighbors
    • Family members
    • Caretakers
    • Financial advisors or someone who manages the elder’s finances
    • Bankers and tellers
    • Insurance and annuity salespersons
    • Mortgage brokers
  • What is financial elder abuse?

    California Welfare and Institutions Code section 15610.30(a) broadly defines financial abuse, which occurs when a person or entity does any of the following:

    • takes, secretes, appropriates, obtains or retains, any interest in real or personal property, for a wrongful use, or with intent to defraud or both; or
    • assists in doing any of the above described acts; or
    • does any of the above described acts through “undue influence” as defined in Welf. & Inst.C. § 15610.70. [Teselle v. McLoughlin, 173 Cal. App. 4th 156, 174, 92 Cal. Rptr. 3d 696, 712 (3d Dist. 2009)]

Your Next Step Starts Here Contact Us Today

A member of our team will be in touch shortly to confirm your contact details or address questions you may have.

  • Please enter your first name.
  • Please enter your last name.
  • Please enter your phone number.
    This isn't a valid phone number.
  • Please enter your email address.
    This isn't a valid email address.
  • Please make a selection.
  • Please enter a message.
  • By submitting, you agree to be contacted about your request & other information using automated technology. Message frequency varies. Msg & data rates may apply. Text STOP to cancel. Acceptable Use Policy

Delivering Successful Outcomes For Our Clients, Case After Case Proven Results, Trusted Representation

Our top priority is to devise customized legal strategies that are tailored to the unique legal needs of our clients, no matter how simple or complicated their situations, might be.

  • Administrative Complaints

    Exhausted administrative remedies with Board of Equalization including a 2-3 split decision in a live hearing with the Sacramento BOE representatives in full session, filed suit in Superior Court afterwards against BOE and settled for 6% of the amount demanded by the BOE.

  • Bad Faith Insurance Litigation

    The Webb Law Group team obtained indemnification & attorney fees for over $350,000 where the insurance company had denied the request to indemnify for client who had four prior law firms.

  • Civil Litigation

    Has handled matters at all stages of litigation. Over 79 jury and bench trials. Well over 600 depositions. Heavier trial years include 14 weeks of trials in 2013 alone, and 6 trials to verdict during 2017. Mr. Webb and his team regularly handles trade secret disputes, unfair business practices, including Intellectual Property matters and duty of loyalty issues.

  • Judgment Enforcement

    Obtained “no-knock” warrants directing sheriff to break and enter commercial business for seizure of private property in order to satisfy 6-digit judgment. Teaches Judgment Enforcement and handles stable of enforcement clients for commercial (non-consumer) collection issues in business-to-business arena.

  • Rosenbaum V Automotive Funding

    5 Week Jury trial in consolidated Orange County superior court case with 7-digit award including a jury award of punitives for underlying class action matter.